City of Atlanta to Install Solar Panels on 28 City Buildings


solar atlanta(APN) ATLANTA — City of Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed held a press conference Monday, November 23, 2015 at Atlanta City Hall to announce that the City is launching Solar Atlanta, its first solar energy program.


The program will allow solar panels to be installed on the roofs of 28 municipal buildings in Atlanta.  This is the first program of its kind for a municipality in Georgia and the largest municipal solar energy program in the U.S. Southeast region.


Over 600 municipal buildings were evaluated for solar capacity before 28 buildings were selected.


“Some of the recreation centers and fire stations will get as much as forty percent of their power needs from a safe, sustainable, and renewable source: the Sun,” Mayor Reed said.


This program is expected to reduce the City’s electric bills and also reduce pollution.


The solar panels are projected to reduce the city’s carbon dioxide emissions by 159 megatons and save 2.6 billion gallons of water through the year 2030.


“It makes great financial and environmental sense,” Reed said.  “It puts us closer to being a top tier city for sustainability in the United States,” he added.


In 2012, Councilwoman Natalyn Archibong (District 5) raised questions about the possibility of municipal buildings using solar panels.


At that time, the Office of Sustainability issued a memo stating that installing solar panels were considered financially unfeasible, as reported in Atlanta Progressive News.


However, APN reported in September 2015 that the appointment of former State Rep. Stephanie Benfield (D-Atlanta) as Director of the Mayor’s Office of Sustainability, would likely lead to major positive developments in terms of the City investing in renewable energy.


Benfield tells Atlanta Progressive News that the Solar Atlanta Plan “is being financed through a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and HB 57 (The Solar Free Market Financing Act of 2015) made this type of financing available.”


PPA’s allow solar developers to own and manage solar panels, while the City of Atlanta will buy the electricity the panels generate.  It allows municipalities, businesses, and residential customers to access solar technology without the upfront cost.


Solar has been painfully slow coming to Georgia because it was not considered economically feasible until the General Assembly last year changed the law to allow third party financing of solar.


“This legislation has the potential to revolutionize the solar market in Georgia,” Benfield said.


Benfield hopes Atlanta can serve as a model for other cities and private commercial entities to take advantage of PPA’s to finance their own solar installations.


Representatives from other cities are already picking up on the opportunity to bring Atlanta’s solar energy model to their cities.


Jonnell Carol Minefee, a sales representative with Solar Tyme, tells APN she plans to take Atlanta’s solar plan back to Columbus, Georgia, where she hopes it will be replicated.


The federal solar investment tax credit expires in 2016.  Benfield wants it extended, so the solar market in Georgia and across the country will continue to thrive.


Environment Georgia releases a report every year ranking cities for their solar infrastructure and last year Atlanta ranked 39th in the country.


Georgia has a vast untapped potential for solar energy, far more than Germany, the world leader in solar power generation.  The solar plan will help enhance Atlanta’s solar ranking in the future.


“Atlanta should be the South’s solar leader with our abundant sunshine, we could be a hub for renewable energy jobs and fossil fuel free power,” Jennette Gayer, Director, Environment Georgia, said.


The City of Atlanta will issue request for proposals and invite solar developers to participate in the initiative through a competitive bidding process.


This announce comes at a good time, because in a week representatives from Atlanta will be in Paris for the Worldwide Summit on Climate.




  • Solar energy is not economical in Georgia. We get 70 percent the sun light of desert areas out West. The only reason we have solar energy is due to subsidies by the Federal government and possibly state and local governments. Most certainly tax payers will take a loss on this program. Nationally due to federal subsidies and locally because the cost of electricity from the PPA most likely will be higher than what Georgia Power charges the city.

    A feature of solar energy most don’t consider is it has to have backup sources of electricity when the sun doesn’t shine, rainfall, or clouds. This intermittent behavior makes the backup electricity source operate less efficiently than normal. This is an additional cost for solar energy.

    The city is wasting millions of tax dollars in the name of sustainability. Look at the trolley downtown. We have deplorable roads that are damaging cars of all who drive in the city. Will sanity ever take place in this government?

    James H. Rust, professor of nuclear engineering

  • Another factor about solar energy that is ignored. Georgia Power generates electricity for around 4 or 5 cents per kilowatt-hour. Residential customers pay 11 or 12 cents per kilowatt-hours because of sales taxes, charges for use of right of way for power poles, and charges for billing and repairing damages done to transmission lines due to wind, rain, or snow storms. We have a lot of trees in Georgia and the charges for billing and line maintenance is also 4 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour. People who substitute solar energy for portions of their utility bill don’t pay this maintenance charge which the utility needs to collect to stay in operation. This means increased charges for those who don’t have solar energy to pay for the lack of payments by solar power users. Therefore, for the City of Atlanta to install solar panels, means the rest of the power users have to make up these loss of payments by higher bills.

    So Atlanta solar panels cost tax payers due to solar subsidies and means higher bills for rate payers because of loss of payments from solar power.

    This loss of payments has caused problems in Arizona and Hawaii because of more solar use due to more sunshine. The states are proposing or maybe have implemented a charge for solar users of $5 per month per kilowatt of installed solar. If Atlanta installs 2 Megawatts of solar energy, it might be liable for $10,000 monthly payment to make up Georgia Power losses for its service.

    James H. Rust, professor of nuclear engineering

  • Great thanks giving news! Hurray for Stephanie Stuckey Benfield and City of Atlanta. Mister Rust needs to bone up on the energy scene! Nuclear power must be rotting his brain :) Read the groundbreaking 2007 study Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free Future: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy available for free download at and also One way you can tell that the sun is ready to power the earth (as it ever has) is the intensity of resistance from old guard poison power advocates like Rust, Duke, Georgia Power.

Leave a Reply to James Rust Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eight − = 6