Atlanta Progressive News

(APN) ATLANTA — As we begin to wrap up our yearlong pre-election coverage of Atlanta’s citywide and Council district elections for 2009, we sent a questionnaire to the nine candidates vying to replace retiring Councilman Jim Maddox in District 11.

Out of the nine candidates, eight responded; the only person who did not respond was Keisha Bottoms.

Those who did respond were Ray Abram, Johnny Dixon, A. Reginald Eaves, Morris “Mo” Finley, Silas Kevil, Edith Ladipo, Alvelyn Sanders, and Juanita Smith.

Maddox had been the longest-serving Member of Council and had been chair of the Community Development and Human Resources Committee.

Maddox did not support Council oversight of the public housing demolitions, consistently fell asleep during committee and Full Council meetings, allowed the Atlanta Housing Authority to tell falsehoods and escape meaningful oversight at CDHR, attempted to stifle public comment, got into a public argument with Councilwoman Felicia Moore when she attempted to speak at CDHR, and at one point threatened to have the present editor arrested for speaking up against his plans to stifle public comment.

Having now had the opportunity to hear from a wide and diverse group of candidates from District 11 who seek to represent the area in Southwest Atlanta, it appears that Maddox had been holding the District back from the possibility of having true progressive representation more in line with the needs and interests of the District.

Thus far, APN has conducted interviews with every major mayoral candidate; Council President candidates Ceasar Mitchell and Clair Muller; Post 1 at large candidates Michael Julian Bond, Adam Brackman, and Dwanda Farmer; and Post 2 at large candidate Amir Farokhi. We also published questionnaire responses from District 6 candidates Bahareh Azizi, Steve Brodie, and Liz Coyle; this was another open seat with several candidates.

Last week, APN sent questionnaires to Shelitha Robertson and Lamar Willis (incumbent) for the Post 3 at large seat, and is looking forward to publishing responses from them as well.

APN is also preparing our Council candidate endorsement list, for expected publication within about a week.

Here are the District 11 responses:

1. What experience do you have in politics, community organizing, and/or progressive activism?

ABRAM: In my local community, Laurens Valley, I have been very involved in organizing for a safe community. During the last 12 months, we had one or two burglaries each month within my immediate neighborhood. We had contacted the police on several occasions for a solution but were ignored. I was instrumental in helping to bring news media attention to the situation. This attention culminated in a face to face meeting with Deputy Chief Peter Andresen, where we were able to agree on the police providing increased patrols and crime prevention training for our residents. Additionally, I am a board member of StartAtlanta, an organization that is working to stimulate the economy by helping entrepreneurs find capital and guidance. As a former NAACP chapter president, I have spoken out and led marches on issues ranging from Apartheid to ending hunger in America.

DIXON: Emory University prepared me for a life of service and I truly believe in the notion of Service above Self. My service to District 11 is unmatched. As President of the Greenbriar Campbellton Road Business Association, I have advocated for a cleaner, safer, and more economically viable Southwest Atlanta. My role as Chief of Staff for Mt. Carmel Baptist Church has allowed me to see and hear first hand the concerns of the citizens in our community. I have fought for more police and better city services in our community, I have cleaned up countless illegal dumps, and I have led the fight to enhance business along the Campbellton Road Corridor. My work experience with the Georgia Dept. of Juvenile Justice and the State Board of Pardons and Paroles gives me a unique perspective in helping our community address the issues of our youth and crime. In addition, I have worked within the community to improve the quality of education and level of opportunities for children and youth in Southwest Atlanta. I have created programs such as the Southwest Atlanta Summer Basketball League and Youth Against Crime Football Camp to give youth in the community positive activities during the summer months. I began an Annual Banquet honoring Therrell High Top Achievers as well as an on-going Speaker’s Forum at Therrell High to motivate students. I am on the Therrell High Advisory Board and led the fight to ensure all students received books last year at the school.

EAVES: I am currently the Chairman of the People’s Agenda, Criminal Justice Committee, and an active member with the Concerned Black Clergy. I have never stopped fighting for the least of these whether it is a protest, rally or going to jail. I was appointed by former Mayor Maynard Jackson as Atlanta’s 1st African American Public Safety Director in the United States of America. I was elected to the Fulton County Commission and elected among my colleagues as Vice Chair, served as President of The Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials (GABEO) and President of the National Association of Black County officials (NABCO).

FINLEY: I served as Vice Chair on a county Community Relations Commission for five years and on the Atlanta City Council for a total of five terms, three as district councilman and two as an at-large councilman.

KEVIL: For 25 years I have worked for The Atlanta Fire Department. As you know we have not had the most wondrous and supportive relationship with several Mayors and City Councils. As a result, we have had to organize ourselves internally, collectively and politically in order to achieve our goals. I have always been an outspoken advocate for our profession and the safety of out citizens. Community organizing is not limited to where one lives or what one does in his/her neighborhood. Having been involved with union activities, helping and supporting members within the community of city employees; working with people in various departments; with internal and external customers; developing relationships that promote the goal of a safe environment in a proactive way for the safety of the citizens certainly qualifies as progressive activism.

LAPIDO: I ran as a candidate for Council District 11 circa 1985 and a Candidate for Georgia House District 61 in 2008. I have been a community organizer since l980 when I served for 5 years as the chair of Neighborhood Planning Unit R and Presiding Officer of the Atlanta Planning and Advisory Board for 2 terms. I have organized neighborhood leaders to conduct comprehensive studies, environmental assessments and training, and stream analysis. Each of these activities included intergenerational, male, females, adults and youth. Currently I am working with Georgia Standup to ensure meaningful involvement in the redevelopment of Fort Macpherson. I serve as Chair of the Jobs and Economic Development Focus Group.

SANDERS: Through the Fulton County Democratic Party, where I serve as a post-seat holder, I reactivated the South Fulton Democratic Committee, which included southwest Atlanta. As its president, the Committee reconnected the community to the Party through voter registration, candidate forums, and issues research. My public service continues as a recently ordained minister, serving on staff at Big Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church, where I am committed to following in the tradition of esteemed faith leaders who impacted change globally. I served on staff for President Barack Obama’s campaign in Georgia-based at the state headquarters in midtown Atlanta, responsible for field operations for that office. I am a former journalist and instructor in the Atlanta University Center.

SMITH: I have an extensive background in the area of community organization on two fronts. First, during my 32-year tenure with the Atlanta Police Department, I organized neighborhood watch programs throughout the city. The process included recruiting volunteers to act as liaisons between the police and their neighborhood, as well as canvassing the entire community to include as many residents as possible in the program. An important part of the watch program was to educate residents on how to sustain the watch, especially after the criminal activity had been resolved. Another group that I organized while at the Department consisted of youth that participated in the Southwest Atlanta Teen Anti-Violence. This program was initiated in Zone 4 to address the issue of teen violence. The participants were in the program from the fifth grade under they graduated from high school. Activities include workshops, trips and conducting community service projects monthly. My civic involvement includes recruiting members to address issues in Neighborhood Planning Unit P. Quarterly meetings are held, but environment issues are addressed constantly, with members working on specific hazards throughout the community. We are also in the process of contacting leaders in the area to assist with a communitywide yard sale to benefit Fire Station #31 on Fairburn Road.

2. What would you do to increase affordable housing in Atlanta, particularly in District 11?

ABRAM: (INCLUSIONARY ZONING.) Atlanta needs an inclusionary housing ordinance, which would give developers an incentive to provide a percentage of new homes to low or middle income families. This would help the city to remain balanced and help prevent pockets of very rich and very poor. The way I would help get the ordinance to pass is by allowing “in-lieu payments.” In some developments, the costs of living in a certain building outside of housing costs (parking, neighborhood restaurants, etc.) may make it difficult for a person of limited means to live comfortably in an area. In such cases, the developer could pay a fee to the housing authority which could be used to subsidize housing in a more affordable neighborhood.

DIXON: (DISTRICT ALREADY HAS ENOUGH.) In my opinion, District 11 has plenty of affordable housing stock. In fact, a considerably large percentage of the Atlanta Housing Authority’s subsidized housing can be found in District 11.

EAVES: (APPLY FOR FEDERAL GRANTS SUCH AS HOME.) As City Councilman, I will increase affordable housing by teaming up with nonprofit organizations to help apply for federal government grants such as the HOME Investment Partnership Program through the Housing and Urban Development Inc (HUD). HOME provides formula grants to States and localities that communities use-often in partnership with local nonprofit groups-to fund a wide range of activities that build, buy, and/or rehabilitate affordable housing for rent or homeownership or provide direct rental assistance to low-income people.

FINLEY: (MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE.) I would try and advocate for the communities to reclaim vacant and blighted properties, try and attract developers who could promote economic revitalization by creating entire neighborhoods of new, single-family homes and review all available federally subsidized programs for mortgage assistance, etc.

KEVIL: (MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE.) I have been a real estate agent and broker for 24 years and housing has never been more affordable. Those who are able to purchase a home today, are truly buying value. Homes are currently selling for 40% to 60% of there previous sales prices of 4 years ago. The pressing need is not to increase the number of affordable housing units. The need is increase the access to mortgage funding. The problem is mortgage money is not available due to current lending criteria. The best way to have an impact on affordable housing, is to get the City’s financial house in order first and foremost. At the same time, advocate and promote programs that give assistance to potential homeowners. This way, citizens are being “prepared for home ownership.” Finally, as funds become available, partner with public and private agencies to offer down payment assistance to those who want to purchase home within the city.

LADIPO: (CREATE WRITTEN INVENTORY, RECRUIT DEVELOPERS.) To increase the number of affordable houses in District 11 I would first conduct an inventory of existing housing units and their current condition. Next I would work with existing owners to of create an inventory of housing units within District 11 for existing residents and determine the number of units required over time. We would than establish an ongoing housing program to recruit, manage, and lease/purchase quality housing units for residents at an affordable price. Residents will be given an opportunity upgrade their housing units as their economic and employment conditions change.

SANDERS: (REDEVELOP VACANT UNITS.) Affordable housing in District 11 can be increased by working with the Neighborhood Stabilization Program to identify and redevelop vacant properties.

SMITH: (INCLUSIONARY ZONING.) To increase affordable housing, I would push for inclusionary zoning for affordable housing sites on current vacant lots and/or vacant, abandoned dwellings/commercial properties. Another avenue is to aggressively pursue partnerships between non-profits and local government entities to provide affordable permanent housing.

3. What is your position on the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless? Would you support restoring City funding (which Franklin cut) or recommending federal funding (which Franklin stood in the way of) for the shelter?

ABRAM: (YES.) You can tell the strength of a nation by how it treats it’s most vulnerable. I think that supporting the Task Force is in the best interest of us all. During a budget crunch it is often politically expedient to cut funding for programs that help people who cannot or do not vote. Unfortunately, the people who these programs help do not disappear simply because the funding did. The costs associated with helping these groups are simply passed on to other departments. I believe we should fund the Metro Atlanta Task Force because they are best suited to handle the needs of the homeless population. They have been perfecting their system for almost 30 years. Also, how much more does it cost to incarcerate a person then it does to help them get on their feet.

DIXON: (SHOULD SUPPORT, WILL EVALUATE.) I believe any organization that reaches out to those less fortunate should be supported by the city. In regards to the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, I would support a complete evaluation of its qualitative and quantitative services delivered before making any decisions on funding.

EAVES: (IMPLIED YES, WILL MEET WITH BEATY.) My position on this delicate situation is to meet with Ms. Anita Beaty, Director of the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless. I am a starch supporter of Ms Beaty and her task force however. As City Councilman, I will request a meeting with her to address her critics concerns regarding poor management and the possibilities of federal funding. Moreover, as a bridge builder, I will actively work with my colleagues on City Council, the new Administration and the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless so all parties can agree on an adequate quality living of life for homeless individuals throughout the City of Atlanta.

FINLEY: (CITY FUNDING NO, FEDERAL YES.) I would not support City funding in the present financial climate. However, I would fully recommend federal funding, since such a large percentage of homeless individuals are transients and it is a problem of national scope.

KEVIL: (YES.) I absolutely would. Providing for those who have the least in our community is as much a moral obligation for society as it is a financial concern. We must find a way to balance the two. With the amount of available housing, warehouse space and other large structures, there has got to be a better way to provide for those who are homeless.

LADIPO: (IMPLIED YES.) I do not have a comprehensive understanding of all the needs of the homeless however I will support all efforts to improve the quality of life of the homeless including increasing employment opportunities, affordable housing, medical services, as well as provide education and training opportunities for families.

SANDERS: (YES.) I support the efforts of the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless. I would support restoring funding from the City of Atlanta, as well as recommending federal funding.

SMITH: (YES.) I am encouraged by the work that Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless does, especially the street outreach and resident volunteer components. I support providing City funding and federal funding to enhance current programs and create more programs for homeless families.

4. What is your opinion of the Beltline? What would you do, if anything, to prevent further gentrification in South Atlanta and to prevent working-class people from being priced out of the area? Also, as far as the area on Campbellton Road- how would you promote development while preventing gentrification?

ABRAM: ([ON PREVENTING GENTRIFICATION] INCLUSIONARY ZONING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION.) The concept of the beltline is a good one, connecting Atlanta’s neighborhoods with a light rail transit system will promote growth and reduce traffic congestion. The problem is that the developers have gotten ahead of the system and have started buying out lower income houses, demolishing them and replacing them with higher end homes. I think this growth must be planned and managed. In my opinion, there are two ways to prevent gentrification: inclusionary housing and historic preservation ordinances. The city can mandate that certain neighborhoods not be touched due to the historic value of the community. In the case of Campbellton Road I think we need a combination of the two. Some housing units in our area are unlivable and need to be demolished to make room for new spaces. A percentage of those new spaces need to be affordable housing. In the case of older established neighborhoods, historic area protections must be put in place.

DIXON: (NO SPECIFIC PLANS.) I believe the Beltline will be a great attribute to the city of Atlanta, but the timeline and costs associated with its completion need to be re-evaluated. I believe the city has a moral responsibility to protect those homeowners who have resided in a community for years and have a desire to remain there. More programs should be designed to help citizens maintain and increase property values. In addition, the city should develop and deliver quality services and infrastructure improvements to avoid reduction in property values. In regards to Campbellton Road, several needs must be addressed to enhance development. First, the community with support from the city must lead an effort to remove the blight that currently permeates the corridor. Currently, there are too many illegal dumps, dilapidated buildings, and unkept lots. Secondly, crime must be reduced so that residents, patrons, and business owners feel safe. Lastly, the city must invest in the corridor’s infrastructure. Campbellton Road needs sidewalks, improved lighting, and road repavement. These improvements will help sustain current businesses and lure new businesses to the area.

EAVES: (HELP MORE PEOPLE BUY HOMES.) In my opinion, Mayor Franklin conducted a study, which determined revenue generated from the BeltLine Tax Allocation District (TAD) would cover approximately 60 percent of estimated project costs — without requiring a tax increase. The study also forecast substantial long-term economic development benefits for the city. As part of a broader citywide effort, approximately $240 million of TAD funds will be set aside into an affordable housing trust fund for the purpose of building workforce housing units. This commitment is estimated to create as many as 5,600 new workforce housing units inside the BeltLine area, the most significant investment in affordable workforce housing in Atlanta’s history. Therefore, it is a great fit for Atlanta. In order to prevent further gentrification in South Atlanta and the working class from being priced out of the area is not a one person decision. As a community, one of the avenues I will take to prevent gentrification will be informing my constituents of any major development plans and pleading with them to attend all of the public meetings. This method will show the powers to be, that we stand and speak as one. Furthermore, to prevent the working class from being priced out of the area, we must work with the banking industry to assist citizens on becoming homes buyers. I am of the opinion, as a home owner prevents from being priced out of the area. In addition, before any new development on Campbellton Road, a blue print plan must be in place to help elevate the traffic on Campbellton Road. Lastly, before I vote on any construction projects in District -11, I will contact my constituents via phone or email to keep them informed.

FINLEY: (SHOULD DO A STUDY.) I feel that the original concept of the Beltline was a sound one, however, things seem to have gone awry – and I feel that it should be revisited. I would need to research the level if any of gentrification on the Campbellton Road corridor before addressing this issue. However, it is incumbent that community and business leaders, elected officials and residents would have to combine their efforts in coming up with a feasibile plan of action that would satisfy all areas of concern.

KEVIL: (IT’S NOT GENTRIFICATION; IT’S INTEGRATION; PEOPLE NOT BEING PRICED OUT.) 1). What is my opinion of the beltline? I’ve read the plan a couple of times and it seems to be a very noble project…

On level, I have a problem with the math of project; on another with the practicality. The project proposes to build 5600 affordable housing units at a cost of $240 million dollars, over 25 years. That breaks down to $42,858.00 per unit, which by today’s’ standard is less than a two-bedroom starter home. Housing of this size over time, stays vacant more than others because families out grow them. They are great for singles, but people have a tendency to get together. When that happens, more room is always needed.

The project also proposes to spend $2.8 billion dollars over the next 25 years or $112 million dollars per year, which is enough money to have a real impact on the subject of homelessness for 10 years and the word homeless can not be found in their redevelopment plan.

The project also proposes a new rail system that connects all this new development and also ties into Marta. I don’t understand why is a new rail system needed when Marta is operating under capacity. A lighter/smaller bus shuttle service feeding into existing Marta operations would be less expensive and have less environmental impact. When I think back to the time when it was easiest to get around on the interstate in Atlanta. The first thing that comes to mind is the 1996 Olympics. Some estimates say an 3 million people were in town for the games and the expressways were barren. I don’t understand why the program promotes an additional rail system for a 100,000 person increase in population.

[Regarding…] the issues of people (working class or other) being priced out of Southwest Atlanta. In my opinion the problem is not home pricing it is loan availability. Furthermore Southwest Atlanta is a very diverse community, made up of 49 neighborhoods where home prices range from $50,000 to $2,000,000. These homes are occupied by people who work on a given job or in a profession. Having lived here for 42 years, what I’ve discovered is that if you in the area, you can graduate to larger (better, more expensive) housing as you income changes, up or down.

On the matter of Gentrification; My family move to Atlanta in 1967. When I enrolled in Southwest High School the School was 80% or better Caucasian. When I graduated in 1972, there were less than 18 Caucasian in the school. Back then we did not have gentrification, we had integration. A different term applied to a different class of people. All things considered, the neighborhood has not gotten an worse because of the change in complexion. For me to take a position against gentrification based on race (if that is what is implied by the question) would be foolish. That would be discrimination and goes against my desire to have persons of good character in my neighborhood, no matter who they are.

LADIPO: (ADDRESS ZONING, GIVE GRANTS TO REFURBISH HOMES.) First, I believe that most people, regardless of race, gender or ethnicity want to live in a safe, clean, green community that is managed by government officials that maintain a leaner financially secure and transparent budget process. Gentrification is a function benign neglect to reduce the economic vitality and investor’s confidence in selected areas. My assessment of the gentrification issues is that public policies that are not based on clear and concise zoning and planning practices generally negatively impacts less empowered citizens. I believe that community planning should be based on best practices and not on the socioeconomic or other biased factors established by city officials. One planning solution for gentrification is to consider restriction on the square footage of new construction and to provide grants to existing home owners to upgrade and repair existing housing units. Provide tax abatements similar to programs offered in Virginia Highland, Summerhill, and Communities to minimize an overwhelming tax burden.

SANDERS: (COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT.) The BeltLine is an opportunity to connect neighborhoods in a cohesive way and move us closer to one Atlanta. Proposed development should always include community input and community benefits. With community involvement — and approval — of development, gentrification can be prevented, and working-class residents can be protected.

SMITH: (COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENTS, COULD INCLUDE RENT CONTROL OR PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT.) I like the Beltline concept and also the creation of other beltlines throughout the city. Community Benefits agreements can assist with desirable commercial/residential development along the Campbellton Road corridor, while making sure that certain components are included in the agreement to prevent further gentrification, such as rent control for current working-class residents or local government entities making sure that current homeowners are not taxed out of their homes. This will also apply to South Atlanta.

5. APN raised several concerns about the AHA demolition of public housing, including apparent fraudulent claims by AHA about the condition of some of the buildings; lack of consultation with residents, City Council and the public; and the lack of availability of voucher leasing opportunities for displaced residents. What is your opinion about the demolitions? Do you have concerns and what is your response to the concerns raised by APN?

ABRAM: (YES [HAS CONCERNS].) Before you demolish a building you have to get input from the Council and the residents. Without this safety net there is a potential for “profit before people” policies. Additionally, it is unconscionable to destroy the home of someone who lives in subsidized housing without providing new subsidized housing for them to move to. If indeed the current living conditions of the building are so bad that they cannot be repaired, then after a vote of the council, demolition can be approved, but along with that approval there must be a plan to house the displaced residents.

DIXON: (YES.) While I believe the effort to demolish public housing in Atlanta is a good one, I do not believe the AHA has done a good job in its planning and executing of the program. First there should have been more community input, more City Council oversight, and assurances that families would have available housing in convenient areas. Secondly, the City of Atlanta and the AHA failed to study the impact these demolitions would have on other communities throughout the city such as District 11. I have argued for several years now that the city and the AHA should have equipped our communities with additional resources such as more police, more training programs for residents, and more activities for our youth.

EAVES: (UNCLEAR, WILL KEEP CONSTITUENTS INFORMED.) As your next City Councilman, I will keep my constituents informed about demolition that will affect them.

FINLEY: (YES.) I, while not being privy to council’s proceedings, was in opposition to the demolitions, especially when it was alledged that there was some discrepancy/fraud. I have spoken with displaced residents and there is a wide array of opinions and different levels of concern. I would be interested in knowing what specific criteria is involved in the issuance of vouchers.

KEVIL: (UNCLEAR, SUPPORTS OVERSIGHT.) Any impact to housing that affects a large segment of the population, especially public housing, should go before the full council before for review and approval. This needs to be written into the city code.

LADIPO: (YES.) I have concerns about displacement of residents especially if the process used to remove tenants and/or demolish the public housing structures does not comply with applicable Federal law. I would also be concerned if Federal laws were violated to use the property for a non public purpose.

SANDERS: (YES.) Respecting the humanity of another is always important, as well as acting in the best interest of those who have elected you, and whom you vow to represent. The concerns are valid; critical decisions should never be made based on false or distorted information. As a representative of the people, the City Council should always consult constituents, and provide leadership on their behalf.

SMITH: (YES.) Inclusion of all parties involved is always the answer to solving community issues and promoting community trust. I believe in conducting tours of affected areas with all of the stakeholders so that everyone can see the problem together and start to plan right there in the current surroundings! If displaced residents were not given voucher leasing opportunities, AHA should be ashamed! I am concerned that the elderly living in AHA properties will not be given a voice, and this can not happen!

6. In 2008, Felicia Moore (District 9) sought to have City Council oversight of the AHA demolitions when APN revealed the Mayor was signing off on the demolition applications to HUD without Council input. The Mayor argued it was her legal purview and she didn’t need Council; an Emory law professor and some Council members argued it wasn’t. Would you have supported Moore’s proposed ordinance to require Council approval of AHA demolitions? (FYI- Jim Maddox did not.)

ABRAM: (YES.) I believe that a large portion the city council’s job is to provide a necessary balance of power to the mayor. Especially when decisions involve something as major as relocating a large group of people, I think better decisions come out of recommendations from the entire council instead of from the Mayor only.

DIXON: (YES.) Yes, I would have supported the ordinance requiring council approval of AHA demolitions. I believe that it is essential that decisions that impact so many lives go through a strenuous checks and balances to ensure that sound decisions are made.

EAVES: (YES AND WOULD HAVE CO-SPONSORED.) This is a democracy and therefore Council members should have been involved in the decision making process. I would have not only supported Councilwoman Felicia Moore on the ordinance, I would have been a co-sponsor as well.

FINLEY: (YES.) I fully support Ms. Moore’s position.

KEVIL: (YES.) [SEE #5.]

LADIPO: (YES.) Yes, I would have supported Ms. Moore’s position because all commitments for funding, and the disposition of public land and facilities is a function of the Atlanta City Council and the Mayor. State Law requires that every municipality establish public policies regarding how it will process and dispose of public land and facilities. This includes park land and facilities historic properties and housing facilities. In addition federal law has its own guidelines regarding disposition of federally subsidized property. It is my understanding that due process that includes an opportunity for public review, opportunity to petition the government etc must be a part of the process.

SANDERS: (YES.) Yes, I would have supported Councilmember Moore’s proposed ordinance.

SMITH: (YES.) YES! There should always be input from council when it affects so many people!

7. AHA is likely to go after remaining senior high rises for demolition, as developers are surely salivating over that property. If the senior residents there did not want to move would you support them?

ABRAM: (YES.) Yes I would. Demolition and relocation is a step to take when a building has outlived its usefulness or has become unsafe for its residents. I think it sets a dangerous precedent to demolish buildings for the sake of greater profitability. I’ve heard it said that all politics is local, and there is nothing more local than your residence. The people who live in a building, especially a public building, should have a voice in the future of that building.

DIXON: (YES.) Yes, I would support our seniors in their right to remain in their homes. We should be a city that reveres and protects our seniors and their choice to live comfortably and in a stable environment.

EAVES: (YES.) I will always support the Senior Citizens one hundred percent. However, if I find a facility that is not up to code and does not provide a quality living of life for the Seniors, I will march down to the Atlanta Housing Authority (AHA) demanding that the building is torn down and must be re-build.

FINLEY: (YES.) I would support the rehabilitation of existing facilities as opposed to their demolition. I feel that we as citizens along with our elected officials should petition the federal government to set up specific policies whereby we rebuild/ replace demolished properties at a rate of 150%. Our life expectancy is rising and as such we will need more rather than less housing options for seniors.

KEVIL: (NOT NECESSARILY, CONSIDER LAW AND CONTRACTS.) I don’t know if developers are salivating over these properties as the question implies. What I do know that the law that governs the sale of real property must me followed. Also, if there are contractual obligations with the tenants, the AHA must honor them. For me to simply state that I would support the senior residents because they did not want to move, without consideration for the law and other factors would be short sited.

LADIPO: (UNCLEAR, IMPLIED YES.) There is a legal question as to whether AHA, City of Atlanta or HUD actually own public housing communities o. If the ownership reverts back to HUD, than there is a question as to whether or not residents can be removed from their residents without due process. Furthermore, if the tenants do not want to move it is my understanding that there are provisions in the law that gives tenants or the association the right to petition the Secretary of HUD for relief. These are issues that need to be researched and discussed with HUD officials.

SANDERS: (YES.) If senior residents did not want to move, I would support their decision. I would trust that the senior community would be give ample opportunity to share their wishes and make any recommendations, and make sure their voices have been heard and honored.

SMITH: (BIG YES.) YES! YES! YES! As a matter of fact, groups should organize now (if they have not) to have plans in place to address and resolve this issue! This coalition should have a majority membership of senior citizens.

8. What is your solution to increase public transportation in Atlanta?

ABRAM: Public transportation must be convenient, safe and reliable in order to be used regularly. We must work with the state of Georgia and the surrounding counties to help the city provide adequate public transportation. An already cash strapped city should not have to pay to provide public transportation to commuters from Cobb and Gwinnett who do not pay taxes here. I also believe that a light rail system such as that proposed by the beltline project will help alleviate some of the congestion that occurs during rush hour and when big events are in town.

DIXON: The city of Atlanta must improve its relationship with the state and federal governments so that it can draw upon more state and federal monies to increase the number of routes, create more flexible hours, and charge reasonable fares. Also, the city must reach out to surrounding counties in the metro Atlanta area to solicit their support in public transportation expansion and point out the benefits for their counties such as less congestion, less pollution, and an improved quality of life.

EAVES: The solution to increase public transportation in Atlanta is by having town hall meetings with my constituents to voice their opinions of where transit lacks in Atlanta. I would request a MARTA representatives provide a study to determine a solution to my constituents needs and to keep me informed on any transit modifications to bus routes throughout my district.

FINLEY: I would look into the current tax rates as applied to in-town public (paid) parking facilities, implement a surcharge for all persons using the same. Make “MARTA” an attractive alternative, increase police visibility in and around our neighborhoods. I would also advocate for monetary incentives for voluntary use of public transportation.

KEVIL: The City and Marta, must promote Marta in such a way that people want use the service. There needs to be dialog with other municipalities and they need to be swayed into the Marta mindset. Marta is the answer to public transportation in the metro area.

LADIPO: I believe that public officials need to promote the use of public transportation in Atlanta by using public transportation in the performance of their duties as public officials. Also, create more direct routes to and from work. Create walking zones where cars are not permitted.

SANDERS: The public transportation system needs additional options like street cars, neighborhood shuttles, and light rail. It can be increased through multi-agency cooperation with MARTA, Fulton County, the City of Atlanta, as well and state input. However, the public must be a part of any conversation about transportation to insure that it meets their needs. Public transportation should be considered a regional entity as well.

SMITH: In Miami, the Jitney service (14-18 passenger vans) follow many of the routes that Miami-Dade transit travels at a higher degree of frequency. The jitneys are not operated by the local transit authority and are owned privately. The fare is the same, but a great advantage is earlier service and the frequency. This allows more accessibility for riders.

9. What is your solution to addressing violent crime in Atlanta, particularly, in the high crime areas including Zone 4?

ABRAM: We need an additional zone to handle hotspots. One of the reasons for the spike in crime and low police morale is that the police spend all of their time going from call to call with little time to patrol an area. I think that some politicians will want to talk about adding more police. I don’t think that will necessarily solve the problem. The issue is not the number of officers; it is where they are located. There was a proposal for a Zone 7” that would focus on the hot spots of the city. This would free the other zones, like zone 4, to do more patrolling of the normally quieter neighborhoods. This proposal was voted down due to lack of funds. I would propose that we allocate some of the federal readiness money we’ll receive next year to create the new zone.

DIXON: As councilperson from the 11th District, I would propose restructuring of the APD so that more officers can be transferred from administrative duties to community patrols in the zones. This increases police visibility, reduces 911 call times, and improves the chances of apprehending criminals and investigating crimes. In addition, I would develop activities and opportunities for our youth in an effort to prevent crime among that population. I am in favor of additional funding for PAL as we have seen its positive results among our youth.

EAVES: I strongly believe that there has to be a true partnership between the police department and the community. I will sit down with the police chief and encourage the chief to establish a Mobile Action Unit (MAU). There must be unity in the police department for gangs.

FINLEY: I would introduce a proposal to fund a community based Police Reserve Force that would become the eyes and ears of in-town neighborhoods during the hours of the morning and early afternoon when working families are away from home. This force could be comprised of retirees. B) I would also advocate for a three-step pay increase, use of a police vehicle for travel to and from work and offer a five-year tax abatement for police personnel who purchase a home and reside within Atlanta’s city limits. These are all steps that would substantially increase police presence in our neighborhoods. C) I would press for the implementation of a multi-jurisdictional law enforcement task force, the focus of which would be to wage an all out WAR ON CRIME in the metropolitan Atlanta area.

KEVIL: This is a tough question and there is no magic wand solution. A number of innovative and technological approaches need to be incorporated into crime fighting. More overly, crime is a social problem and it needs to be address as a kind of social illness. We can no longer afford to condemn the people who commit crimes, brand them as criminals and not try to bring them back into the fold of good citizenship. That has tried and has not worked. Good citizenship needs to be a part of our orientation from grade school and must be incorporated into the fabric of our society. As to the particulars of how to deal with crime in the area you mentioned. That is a subject for much debate, by involved parties, experts in the field and decision makers. There is not enough room in your survey for me to adequately address this issue.

LADIPO: I do not believe that there is a single solution to reducing violent crime in Atlanta or in zone 4. However there are several issues that need to be addressed. 1. Strict Enforcement of Truancy Laws. 2. Increase the Neighborhood policing programs. 3. Increase Crime Prevention Efforts. 4. Increase Neighborhood Camera Servellience. 5. Increase recreation and organized programs for youth of all ages. 6. Open and staff public parks in high crime neighborhood. 7. Provide counseling services for youth and adults. 8. Provide employment training for youth and adults.

SANDERS: The public transportation system needs additional options like street cars, neighborhood shuttles, and light rail. It can be increased through multi-agency cooperation with MARTA, Fulton County, the City of Atlanta, as well and state input. However, the public must be a part of any conversation about transportation to insure that it meets their needs. Public transportation should be considered a regional entity as well.

SMITH: I am an advocate of adequate police deployment to address our crime issues, especially in Zone 4. This will assist with better police response to handle problems and a greater lag time for officers to really devote time to community oriented projects, such as drop-ins, community meetings etc. Eventually I would like to see enough police to have 2-person police cars, foot beat teams, etc., with enough investigators to solve neighborhood level crime, including violent crime. As stated earlier, I coordinated an anti-violence program for youth. I strongly believe that education is the key to prevent violence and it must start at an early age with structured programs such as bullying, gun violence and gang prevention. This should continue into the adult population with emphasis on domestic violence, etc.

10. Would you support extending bar and club hours past 2:30am last call?

ABRAM: (YES.) Entertainment revenue and public safety must be balanced. I would advocate that clubs who choose to stay open later pay a surcharge to offset the additional cost to the city.

DIXON: (YES.) I support extending bar and club hours in our city to increase revenue and business growth. Atlanta’s nightlife industry is strong, vibrant and can play a substantial role in supporting the city’s tax digest. In addition, a city which boasts many entertainment options attracts more tourists and conventions which yields more tax dollars for the city.

EAVES: (NO.) No, because of crime and a greater incidence of Driving Under the Influence (DUI), both of which are detrimental to our citizens.

FINLEY: (IMPLIED YES.) Personally, we need to try and contain crime in a comprehensive manner, and I don’t feel that the earlier closing times have been a deterrent. This has resulted in the loss of much needed revenues. It makes for an increase in late night visits to grocery stores for beer and wine purchases and in the proliferation of illegal shot houses and the ordinance does not apply to all aspects of nightlife and statistically crowds have been known to add an element of safety.

KEVIL: (NO.) Personally speaking, I would not. I am now 55 years young, my day starts at 5:30 and ends around 11:00. It would be very, very rare for me to be out at that time of night and I don’t understand why others would want or need to be. Professionally speaking, having worked in public safety, I see that extra ½ hour having the potential to put a more intoxicated individual on our streets, creating an unsafe condition for our citizens. From a safety stand point it’s a bad idea.

LADIPO: (NO.) No.

SANDERS: (NO.) No.

SMITH: (YES.) Yes, 2:30 is too early for tourists that what to bar hop or locals out for a special occasion, or out after a sporting event, concert, play, etc.

11. What is your opinion of the panhandling ordinance that was passed in 2005?

ABRAM: (IMPLIED OPPOSES ORDINANCE.) I think that harassment should be illegal whether the perpetrator is homeless or not. I think that in many cases the ordinance is used to criminalize homelessness, not harassment. Let’s find a way to make sure people have access to basic human needs so they don’t have to beg for it. Then we can justifiably deal with those persons who are trying to make a quick buck by harassing tourists and downtown patrons.

DIXON: (SUPPORTS.) I support the ordinance designed to prohibit panhandling in our downtown sector. For Atlanta’s tourism and convention industries to continue to thrive, it is important that visitors to our city feel safe, comfortable, and not experience any form of harrassment. In addition, citizens who live, work, and play in our city should enjoy a satisfactory quality of life. Furthermore, I believe the city has a responsibility to provide adequate housing, social services, and training to our homeless population. The city must take a more comprehensive approach when addressing homelessness. For example, the city would not only assist with food and housing, but would partner more aggressively with organizations that help individuals return to self-sufficiency.

EAVES: (IMPLIED OPPOSES.) The panhandling ordinance of 2005 does not solve the problem of homelessness in downtown Atlanta.

FINLEY: (SUPPORTS.) I agree with the ordinance as written, having been the victim of and witness to aggressive panhandling practices. However, there should be a solid policy on board for combating the plight of the homeless. Again, it has to be harnessed because it will not be eradicated.

KEVIL: (SUPPORTS.) I’ve read the ordinance and understand why it was written. I think it is well intended and has some merit, particularly when it comes down to personal safety. On Atlanta’s streets, I’ve been approached by panhandlers and by others; while using the ATM machine; crossing the street; pumping gas; while parked at a traffic light. I have waited near my car while others used the ATM so that they could have their personal space. Perhaps it could have been written better, but the intent was there. People need to feel safe and not be harassed, even when no danger exists. I think this is classic case of the well-being of the many, taking precedent over the inconvenience of the few.

LADIPO: (SUPPORTS, SHOULD BE EXTENDED.) I think it should extend to all commercial nodes. In my opinion, panhandling has been a negative influence business in southwest Atlanta.

SANDERS: (SUPPORTS.) I will have to trust that members of the Atlanta City Council considered alternatives prior to passing the panhandling ordinance in 2005. As we move forward, it is vital to end the need for our residents to “panhandle,” rather than legislate against it.

SMITH: (SHOULD REVISIT.) I think that it should be revisited after reviewing the statistics, having public comment from citizens, police, businesses and other stakeholders. I would be interested to compare activity in the “Tourist Triangle” with other locations, such as MARTA stations, sports venues, the bus station and eating establishments.

EDITORIAL NOTE: As previously reported by Atlanta Progressive News, there was already a law against aggressive panhandling in place; the 2005 panhandling law, thus, was not intended to address aggressive panhandling but any exercise of free speech by one person asking another for financial or other assistance.

About the author:

Matthew Cardinale is the News Editor for Atlanta Progressive News and is reachable at matthew@atlantaprogressivenews.com.

Revised syndication policy:

Our syndication policy was updated June 2007. For more information on how to syndicate Atlanta Progressive News content, please visit: http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/extras/syndicate.html