Residents, Advocates Criticize Selection of GSU to Redevelop Turner Field

facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmailfacebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail

turner field community benefits coalition(APN) ATLANTA — Two and a half months after officially putting Turner Field up for sale, the Atlanta Fulton County Recreation Authority (AFCRA) has selected a bidder––Georgia State University.

 

“The writing was on the wall that GSU was always going to win this particular bid. There’s not a lot of people in the market for a gently used stadium,” Matt Garbett, media chair of the Turner Field Community Benefits Coalition (TFCBC), told Atlanta Progressive News.

 

TFCBC is made up of more than forty organizations and many individuals living in the neighborhoods surrounding the stadium.

 

The group has been fighting for residents to have a hand in deciding how the area is redeveloped when the Braves baseball team move to Cobb County next year.

 

TFCBC initially balked at AFCRA’s decision in October 2015 to issue a Request For Proposals (RFP) from potential developers.

 

That is because TFCBC and other residents and advocates were in the midst of a community-driven planning process made possible by a Livable Communities Initiative (LCI) grant.

 

That process would have eventually entailed the issuing of an RFP created with community input.  But AFCRA beat them to it, initially suggesting that the process might take so long that LCI input could be somehow incorporated into the selection process.

 

http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/2015/10/07/analysis-afcra-betrayed-the-turner-field-communities/

 

AFCRA’s RFP covered the same parcels as an early rendering made by Georgia State with the real estate firm Carter.  This lead some to believe that AFCRA intended to cut a deal with the University all along.

 

That rankled residents who rejected Georgia State’s initial proposal to not only keep Turner Field intact, but build another stadium next to it.

 

http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/2015/06/05/new-coalition-challenges-gsus-turner-field-development-plan/

 

The University told 11Alive television news that its current proposal includes two options: the original plan to convert Turner Field into a football stadium and build a new baseball stadium next to it; or a new plan to retrofit Turner Field into a mixed-use housing and retail development, and build a new baseball stadium and a new football stadium on the surrounding property.

 

http://www.11alive.com/story/news/2015/11/23/turner-field-stadiums/76273348/

 

The proposal has not been made public, so further details are unknown.

 

A majority of community members have consistently indicated that they do not want yet another stadium (much less two) in a neighborhood that was destroyed by stadium projects in the past.

 

http://www.alternet.org/economy/black-communities-destroyed-publicly-funded-stadium-swindles-are-fighting-back-new-era

 

TFCBC members are still hopeful that they can influence the plan.

 

“Negotiations have begun, but it’s a long way to sale,” Geoff Heard, who works for the Summerhill Neighborhood Development Corporation, said.

 

“We had concerns that the RFP was issued.  But when you look at the RFP, it does have room for [community] involvement,” Heard explained.

 

The RFP states, “The Preferred Respondent will be expected to begin immediate participation in the LCI study process.”

 

When TFCBC kicked off its LCI planning study with a big event earlier this month, Mayor Kasim Reed, City of Atlanta Planning Department Director Charletta Jacks, and City Council Member (District 11) and AFCRA Director Keisha Lance Bottoms were all in attendance.

 

“The Mayor came out and indicated… that the process would be fair and open.  [AFCRA] has continued to indicate that the desires of the community would be included,” Heard said.

 

Those assurances were echoed in press releases issued by AFCRA and the mayor’s office, when Georgia State’s winning bid was announced.

 

“As we enter this phase, we will continue to work with the surrounding community and partners in the City and County to ensure that they continue to play a vital role in this process.  Our most important objective is that the future redevelopment of this area is one that we can all be proud of,” Lance Bottoms said in a statement.

 

“The LCI process… will have a substantial and clear impact on the redevelopment plan and final design.  I believe this requirement sets this redevelopment effort apart, and demonstrates my commitment to ensuring inclusive, lasting change,” Mayor Reed said in his statement.

 

His words were a departure from comments he made only a month earlier when he defended the lack of community input in AFCRA’s RFP.

 

“We haven’t had community input prior to any [other] RFP… I don’t know why Turner Field is being pulled out as a transaction where this should occur,” Mayor Reed had said at an Atlanta City Council meeting in November 2015.

 

http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/2015/11/01/mayor-reed-defends-lack-of-public-input-on-turner-field-noting-all-projects-lack-such-input/

 

These shifting dynamics have led TFCBC members to be “cautiously optimistic,” Garbett said.

 

The group is moving forward with a survey of 1,800 Turner Field area residents and will hold a series of community meetings to obtain input.

 

Meanwhile, as part of the LCI process, the planning firm Perkins and Will will help turn recommendations into proposals that could be incorporated into Georgia State’s plans.

 

“We have to work on those things on the faith that they mean something,” Garbett said.

 

(END/2015)

5 comments

  • Some people will not be happy no matter how much they are included in the process. If you want to have a say about land you do not own, buy it.

    • Actually the citizens of Atlanta and Fulton County DO own the land. And everyone has a say (and wants a say) about even private land they don’t own through zoning regulations. I’m sure you would be fairly unhappy if the property next to your house was suddenly rezoned for a gas station.

  • Housing would create a lot of jobs, give access to local jobs and more. The Atlanta Regional Commission was just granted billions of “development” funds. Maybe they can look into this without hurting everyday folks. See wikipedia history of Peoplestown named after the Peoples family. This area is not a slum.It has many private homeowners who have paid for private houses. There is a lack of shopping places.

  • South Fulton Guy – Although it is true that pleasing everyone is a rare thing, your latter comment seems largely cynicical and classist. I would urge you to try to “put something in” when providing your input!

  • South Fulton Guy’s comment might be more meaningful if valuing property rights also applied to the resident owners in Peoplestown, but under current conditions it is just hypocrisy.

Leave a Reply to South Fulton Guy Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


9 − = zero