Troy Davis Faces Execution Fourth, Likely Last, Time

facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmailfacebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail

 

(APN) ATLANTA — Troy Davis, the Georgia man whose death row case has drawn international
attention, has again been scheduled for execution for September 21, 2011, but advocates
hope to convince the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant last-minute clemency.
Davis was convicted of shooting a police officer, Mark MacPhail, in Savannah in 1989, but since then, seven of
nine witnesses have recanted their testimony against Davis, and two other witnesses have
implicated another individual as the murderer.
This is the fourth time Davis has had an execution date, although this time he has probably
exhausted his appeals.
Most recently, the Supreme Court of the US ordered a hearing in the trial court as to whether
Davis could prove his innocence claims.  But the trial court ruled against Davis, setting him
back on a path where a new execution date was only a matter of time.
“We are focused right now on educating people about the doubts that continue to persist,
encouraging people to make concerns heard to the Board of Pardons and Paroles, who has ability
to weigh in and prevent the execution and really step in in a situation where the legal process
has failed to alleviate some doubts that Troy Davis is guilty for a crime with which he could
pay with his life,” Laura Moye, Death Penalty Abolition Campaign coordinator for Amnesty International
USA, told Atlanta Progressive News.
“The Board has very wide discretion at what they can look to to grant relief, they are not confined by the
narrow parameters of the legal process, this narrow focus on process and procedure that has hampered
Troy’s ability to have his innocence claims taken seriously,” Moye said.
Meanwhile, despite the fact that the Board previously ruled against Davis, there are at least two
factors which may lead to a different ruling this time.  First, three of the five Board members are
new to the Board and have not heard Davis’s case before; and second, there are two new witnesses who
have implicated another man as the culprit.
One witness, Benjamin Gordon, implicated another man, his relative, Sylvester Coles, as the killer.
Meanwhile, another woman says she witnessed to Coles admitting to her that he shot MacPhail.
When the Supreme Court of the US granted Davis a hearing in the trial court on his innocence claims,
Justice Anthony Scalia dissented, calling the new hearing a “fool’s errand.”  In retrospect, it appears
to some extent, he was right.
“What the problem with the legal system has been is it has been so focused on procedure, it hasn’t been
asking a more fundamental quesiton which is can we rely on the conviction?” Moye said.
“Troy Davis was given an enormous task of proving innocence at the evidentiary hearing in Savannah
last summer.  He was given a task that was almost impossible to achieve without physical evidence,
and with witnesses that the judge didn’t want to believe,” Moye said.
Davis first faced execution in July 2007, but the Board granted a ninety day stay on July 16 so it could review
Davis’s case further.  In the meantime, the Supreme Court of Georgia granted a review of Davis’s case,
which Davis later lost.  The Board later also ruled against Davis.
Davis faced execution a second time in September 2008, but the Supreme Court of the US granted a stay on
September 23, to allow time to consider an appeal the question of whether to grant a new trial, which was
later rejected.
Davis then faced execution again a third time in October 2008, but the 11th Circuit federal court stayed
the execution on October 24 connected to Davis’s innocence claims, which were different than his appeals or requests for
a new trial.
“Psychologicly it must be a torturous process to have someone repeatedly come close to their death.  Most
murders aren’t even like that,” Moye said.
(END / 2011)

(APN) ATLANTA — Troy Davis, the Georgia man whose death row case has drawn international attention, has again been scheduled for execution for September 21, 2011, but advocates hope to convince the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant last-minute clemency.

Davis was convicted of shooting a police officer, Mark MacPhail, in Savannah in 1989, but since then, seven of nine witnesses have recanted their testimony against Davis, and two other witnesses have implicated another individual as the murderer.

This is the fourth time Davis has had an execution date, although this time he has probably exhausted his appeals.  So, this will likely be the last time; either he will be pardoned or he will be executed.

Most recently, the Supreme Court of the US ordered an extraordinary hearing in the trial court as to whether Davis could prove his innocence claims.  But the trial court ruled against Davis, setting him back on a path where a new execution date was only a matter of time.

“We are focused right now on educating people about the doubts that continue to persist, encouraging people to make concerns heard to the Board of Pardons and Paroles, who has the ability to weigh in and prevent the execution and really step in in a situation where the legal process has failed to alleviate some doubts that Troy Davis is guilty for a crime for which he could pay with his life,” Laura Moye, Death Penalty Abolition Campaign Director for Amnesty International USA, told Atlanta Progressive News.

“The Board has very wide discretion at what they can look to to grant relief, they are not confined by the narrow parameters of the legal process, this narrow focus on process and procedure that has hampered Troy’s ability to have his innocence claims taken seriously,” Moye said.

Meanwhile, despite the fact that the Board previously ruled against Davis, there are at least two factors which may lead to a different ruling this time.  First, three of the five Board members are new to the Board and have not heard Davis’s case before; and second, there are two new witnesses who have implicated another man as the culprit, who have not yet testified before the Board.

One witness, Benjamin Gordon, implicated another man, his relative, Sylvester Coles, as the killer.  Meanwhile, another woman says she witnessed Coles admitting to her that he shot MacPhail.

When the Supreme Court of the US granted Davis a hearing in the trial court on his innocence claims, Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, calling the new hearing a “fool’s errand.”  In retrospect, it appears to some extent, he was right.

“What the problem with the legal system has been is it has been so focused on procedure, it hasn’t been asking a more fundamental question which is can we rely on the conviction?” Moye said.

“Troy Davis was given an enormous task of proving innocence at the evidentiary hearing in Savannah last summer.  He was given a task that was almost impossible to achieve without physical evidence, and with witnesses that the judge didn’t want to believe,” Moye said.

Davis first faced execution in July 2007, but the Board granted a ninety day stay on July 16 so it could review Davis’s case further.  In the meantime, the Supreme Court of Georgia granted a review of Davis’s case, which Davis later lost.  The Board later also ruled against Davis.

Davis faced execution a second time in September 2008, but the Supreme Court of the US granted a stay on September 23, to allow time to consider an appeal on the question of whether to grant a new trial, which was later rejected.

Davis then faced execution again a third time in October 2008, but the 11th Circuit federal court stayed the execution on October 24 connected to Davis’s innocence claims, which were legally different than his appeals or requests for a new trial.

“Psychologically it must be a torturous process to have someone repeatedly come close to their death.  Most murders aren’t even like that,” Moye said.

(END / 2011)

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


7 + = nine